Sigma Art 50mm f/1.4 Pricing Announced: $949


The initial pricing for the Sigma Art 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM Lens has been announced: $949.00.

We’ll be tracking all price drops and changes on this widely anticipated lens.

You can also pre-order at B&H Photo Video
or Adorama, limited availability on April 29th, 2014.



See deal archive for:
If you purchase something through a link on our site, we may get a small share of the sale (at no cost to you). Please read our disclosure for more info.

15 comments on “Sigma Art 50mm f/1.4 Pricing Announced: $949

  1. April 11, 2014 at 10:02 am EDT

    In for one

  2. manhattan1
    April 11, 2014 at 8:58 pm EDT

    Do you think this lens is better than canon 50mm 1.2L?

  3. April 11, 2014 at 10:38 pm EDT

    Why should anyone consider this lens over the Canon 50mm f1.4 at half the price?

    1. david
      April 11, 2014 at 11:05 pm EDT

      Are you kidding me? It competes with Otus 55mm f/1.4 at 25% of the cost. You must be from Canon with that BS. Not going to work.

      1. April 12, 2014 at 12:16 pm EDT

        What BS? I asked a real question and you’re attacking me? GFYS if you feel the need to attack someone for asking a REAL question.

    2. CanonPriceWatch
      April 12, 2014 at 1:03 am EDT

      Exactly as David says — this lens competes more with the Otus 55mm in optical quality and build quality.

      1. April 12, 2014 at 12:17 pm EDT

        Sorry, but I’ll have to see test photos before I believe this lens is worth $950.

        1. Emanuil
          April 12, 2014 at 2:57 pm EDT

          See this for test pictures

          http://slrgear.com/reviews/showproduct.php/product/1677

          This lens beats canon 50L and is on par with Zeiss Otus at 1/4 of the price.

    3. ER
      April 12, 2014 at 1:33 am EDT

      Can you comment on the USM autofocus issues with Canon 50mm F1.4 lens? There are some reviews that says its mechanically worse than the cheaper Canon 50 mm F1.8 lens.

    4. inpinotveritas
      April 16, 2014 at 4:22 pm EDT

      Why should anyone consider the Canon 50mm f/1.4 when the 50mm f/1.8 is only a third of the price.

  4. John
    April 12, 2014 at 1:53 am EDT

    I already own the 35mm 1.4 from Sigma, which is…heavenly, paired on the wide end with the Rokinon 14mm, a thoroughly enjoyable lens. The 50mm would have to put out some serious performance versus the 35mm to get me to trade up. Thoughts?

    1. April 13, 2014 at 10:17 am EDT

      It sounds like the focal length will be the determination for you. The Sigma 35 is a wonderful lens. The Sigma 50 seems as if it’s at least comparable and under normal use, you probably wouldn’t notice much of an IQ difference. If you use wide angles (which it sounds like) for landscape, then it comes down to focal length preference. I like my Rokinon 14mm. I love my Sigma 35mm. I never use my Canon 50 1.8 (ugh). I might consider the Sigma 50mm.

      1. John
        April 21, 2014 at 4:06 am EDT

        I suppose what I’d really want would be for this to be a 1.2 rather than a similar performer to my 35mm at a slightly longer focal length – better to invest in an 85 1.2, the holy trinity of 35/85/135 sounds a lot better than 35/50/135 – used 85 1.2s are going for about the equivalent of $250 more than this where I’m at in Japan.

  5. f/8 and be there
    April 12, 2014 at 3:44 am EDT

    $1000 for a 50? bring it 😀

  6. inpinotveritas
    April 16, 2014 at 4:21 pm EDT

    I’m seriously considering using my tax return to preorder this bad boy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *